Supply chain disruptions: Companies that rely on non-sustainable inputs or practices may face supply chain disruptions as environmental and social risks materialize, such as water scarcity, terroristic attacts on infrastructure, large scale international wars, extreme weather events, and social unrest. These disruptions can lead to increased costs, lower revenue, and damage to reputation.

Regulatory risks: As governments increase regulations and standards for sustainable practices, companies that fail to comply may face fines, legal action, and other penalties that can harm their financial performance. Also the increase of regulation may cause stagnation, because it is highly difficult to innovate in an environment with too much regulations.

Reputation risks: Companies that are seen as poor environmental and social stewards may face reputational damage that can reduce customer loyalty, sales, and investor interest. In addition, reputational damage can increase the cost of borrowing and insurance premiums.

Opportunity costs: Companies that do not prioritize sustainability may miss out on opportunities to innovate, differentiate, and create value for customers, employees, and communities. These missed opportunities can harm the company's long-term economical performance. 

Carbon pricing: As governments introduce carbon pricing policies, companies that are high carbon emitters may face higher operating costs, reduced margins, and lower profits. In this area we recommend the work of the Copenhagen Consensus Center.

Stranded assets: Companies that rely on non-sustainable practices or inputs may face the risk of stranded assets, as governments and investors transition to a low-carbon economy. This can lead to a sudden decline in the value of certain assets, such as coal mines and oil fields, resulting in significant economical losses. It is important to mention that coal, gas and oil will have to stay in the market due to the need of large amount of energy to supply the economical growth needed in order to generate a better future.

Sustainable practices: Implementing sustainable practices can require upfront investments, and some companies may view these costs as a barrier to entry. In addition, renewable energy and other sustainable technologies may not yet be cost-competitive with traditional fossil fuel-based technologies. Organizations that aim to phase out fossil fuels run a major reputational risk, as the general public is jet unaware of the high risks of such a step forward and will walk away from these companies when confronted with the reality that it is absolutly unsustainable even to think technicaly about this issue. These entrprises will go bankrupt when the public start to understand the deepth of this issue.